Kenneth Miller Quotes (21 Quotes)

Whenever you debate, you should really have one person representing I.D. on one side and 10,000 scientists on the other. That would give a fair representation of the division of opinion in the scientific community.

This isn't a scientific argument, ... This is a cultural, political and social battle.

The argument for intelligent design basically depends on saying, 'You haven't answered every question with evolution,'... Well, guess what? Science can't answer every question.

Being a Christian, I'm eager to introduce people to Jesus. I just don't think I should do it in the science classroom.

All I know is that he was wrongly accused of some sort of sexual harassment, and that they were going to evict him from it, and that 18 other people signed a petition saying that he was very helpful there and a very nice guy, and that it was only a few who were trying to get him out of there, and I guess he just lost it,

We believe the ice sheet was not around all the time. It was only around during cool snaps of the climate.

No other acoustic instrument can match the piano's expressive range, and no electric instrument can match its mystery.

The main thing that's changed since the 19th Century and the beginning of modern observation has been the widespread increase in fossil fuel use and more greenhouse gases.

There is no controversy within science over the core proposition of evolutionary theory.

The piano is able to communicate the subtlest universal truths by means of wood, metal and vibrating air.

The only evidence that intelligent design is able to muster is the observation that science has not yet explained everything, and therefore design must be kept around as a default explanation for what is left,

The piano's world encompasses glass-nerved virtuosi and stomping barrel-housers in fedoras it is a world of pasture and storm, of perfumed smoke, of liquid mathematics.

going to make a fool of yourself and bring scorn upon the Christian faith.

That's a real concern. Teasing out sea level at any scale is a daunting challenge.

It allows us to understand the mechanisms of sea level change before humans intervened.

The new strategy is to teach intelligent design without calling it intelligent design.

I think its an excellent choice. Were waiting for the call.

What happened .... is that the so-called scientific case for intelligent design completely and totally collapsed under inspection.

We don't regard any scientific theory as the absolute truth.

The scientific argument advanced for intelligent design at the Dover trial, those arguments collapsed, scientifically and intellectually.

We are not trying to establish some institutional career power broker or anything like that. we are really trying to just the opposite.