Danny Sullivan Quotes (37 Quotes)

Yahoo has great organization for its service with great relevancy. I think it's going to definitely help build them up for people looking for that kind of content.

The tremendous growth in search underscores it as a fundamental advertising and public relations medium that has to be considered alongside other ad and PR venues, rather than being an afterthought. The growth also makes the New York event all the more critical for anyone and everyone looking to gain further traction in this surging market. Those not already in it are falling further behind. Those who are taking part face stronger competition for limited search inventory and rising prices. Our conference helps both groups get ahead.

Honestly I think there is no master plan other than 'Let's put this tool out there and see what people do with it,'

They have lots of information. They know what people are clicking on. They know what people are searching for.

He's quick. He naturally knows how to make a car go faster, and that's rare in a young driver. He's proven he's fast everywhere he goes, and he adapts quickly.

The kids showed me the gun and I took it from them and called police. I thought it had something to do with the murders because the girl's car had been found in the lot over there.

I'm interested to see if the search companies who handed over info to the feds lose any market share andor total number of searches in the future due to sharing data with the government.

The P.R. community is learning more, but many remain in the dark.

If the government wants to estimate how much pornography shows up in the searches, then they are asking for data that is useless to them. You can get that information from other companies.

They said, back when they invested in the Internet-over-power-lines company, that part of their corporate mission is 'promoting universal access to the Internet for users,' ... They seem to think they need to make sure everybody can get online, and running your own network certainly makes that a lot easier.

I think it's a good move for them. I've long wondered when they were going to get that whole thing put together. This is related to the idea of organizing information and helping people understand what's going on. Not to say that the other players out there aren't any good.

You look at what he's had to deal with, with his personal concerns, and you understand what kind of person you are dealing with. I have no doubt Scott will handle any pressure that comes his way.

It's my turn now, and the wait was worth it, ... I'm having the time of my life right now.

If you want to measure how much porn is showing up in searches, try searching for it yourself rather than issuing privacy alarm sounding subpoenas. It would certainly be more accurate.

Nothing suggests that they wanted to know who did the searches in any way. Having said this, such a move absolutely should breed some paranoia. They didn't ask for data this time, but next time, they might.

Before this, I was actually of the mind that if you're doing the disclosure, this is the way to go. The more I thought about this, I realized this is evil. You're caving into censorship that you in your heart of hearts don't believe in.

This could have a significant effect on open-wheel racing in this country. It is a big moment, and having a successful driver from here could vastly improve the popularity of F-1 in America.

You could add a billion pages about Britney Spears and that doesn't mean the quality of results will be any better. There have been times when other search indexes have expanded, and the results have actually gotten worse.

This will probably calm some of this thing down.

Dropping the home page count is a positive move that I think helps defuse the entire 'size wars' situation,

We often search for private things that we may prefer not be seen by others, even if the possibility is fairly remote. At minimum, police your own desktop by clearing history. That's the most vulnerable part, I'd say.

AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo did not violate the privacy of any user by handing over this information. No private data was revealed. Nevertheless, by not pushing back against such a bad request for data, it leaves open the real fear that they might not push back if the US government decided to go on a real fishing expedition in the future. Privacy may not have been lost but trust was.

They've mounted a public-relations campaign to counter the perception of bias, but the perception is definitely out there.

Are you asking for a service to actually make the changes, or do you just want them to come and look through your site and suggest things overall and you do it

Hopefully, I'll be overlooked. Hopefully, I'll pull off my best wrestling at state.

SEOs will be much more fragmented on different platforms within social networks. It'll help eliminate a lot of the search spammers, but is going to impact on anyone who gets rankings on search engines without having good content.

Losing the person who is the head of their operations just diminishes credibility for their search and puts a larger question mark behind what they are doing. Overall, the move is not a good sign for their search prospects.

If you have the ability to access your files remotely, you can work on them from anywhere.

It's not an issue of privacy but it raises the question that next time it could be.

I think MSN has some features advertisers will gobble up, but it's too early to say whether it will be a superior experience. They have a sizable amount of traffic. Advertisers will want to reach that audience, and buying through MSN is going to be the only way to do that.

While the search marketing space grows, it's hard to get good people trained, If they're good, others want to poach them.

This is the most high-profile dropping of a company we've seen. Bigger companies have probably been dropped, but we haven't heard about it.

At this point, I think everyone understands that maps are a great way of presenting information and there are probably opportunities there, and that's long overdue.

Users will be the best judge of which search engine is the most appropriate,

It would jeopardize Goggle's position with its competitors and compromise relations with users.

Overall it looks interesting but I dont know if they have anything that the other people couldnt match if they are lacking,

This does make it more competitive for those users,