I am anticipating a pretty rough year. I talked to a landowner this morning who is trying to shoot as many deer as he can to get his numbers lower.
I am anticipating a pretty rough year. I talked to a landowner this morning who is trying to shoot as many deer as he can to get his numbers lower.
How is a landowner who just lost everything going to pay 15,000 or 20,000 to have a lot cleared I mean, there were two or three houses on top of one another in some places.
A wealthy landowner cannot cultivate and improve his farm without spreading comfort and well-being around him. Rich and abundant crops, a numerous population and a prosperous countryside are the rewards for his efforts.
The State of Montana does not require the reclamation (of the mine itself), but the company has told us they will reclaim this. It's private ground, so any reclamation they would do is between the landowner and the company.
It's much cheaper for a landowner and community and for the environment for people to get the permits in the first place and comply with the permits.
ESA-related costs are paid in an inequitable way. Although Congress determined in 1973 that the preservation of endangered species was in the interest of the U. S. as a whole, Congress did not arrange for the nation as a whole to bear the costs of recovery. Instead, these costs are largely borne by the private landowners on whose property rare species are found, regardless of the ability of any particular landowner to bear these costs.
We all need to be courteous towards each other as far as the hunters being courteous towards other hunters but the game is all usually on private land and there's that necessity to be courteous and considerate of the landowner and the public as a whole,
The medieval hall house was very primitive when it became the characteristic form of dwelling of the landowner of the Middle Ages.
Given the landowner situation in Erie, property rights isn't a fight we're going to pick, at least for now. It would have a positive benefit once you're on the water, but it wouldn't get you to the water.
What is even more troubling (than the apparent resistance by the landowner to build the bridge) is the fact that I understand that there has been some possible negotiations from Doug Haigh.
Having an endangered or candidate species on your property should be a good thing, something a landowner can be proud of, not something to avoid. With the administrative reforms we have made to the Endangered Species Act, such as safe harbor agreements, habitat conservation plans, and candidate conservation agreements with assurances, ranchers, timber companies and other landowners are able to participate in the conservation of at-risk species without the concern that their future plans may be delayed or halted.
The real hard concern I have is that it could devalue the property. I'd like to see it preserved, but not at the expense of the landowner. I've talked with some of my neighbors who would be affected by this and they have some concerns, too.
This is a program that is to benefit the renter, not necessarily the landowner.
Ground water has always been the property of the landowner, with the idea that water can be used for the benefit of the land.
You need to back up the landowner when he wants best management practices enforced.
© 2020 Inspirational Stories
© 2020 Inspirational Stories