Whenever you debate, you should really have one person representing I.D. on one side and 10,000 scientists on the other. That would give a fair representation of the division of opinion in the scientific community.
Whenever you debate, you should really have one person representing I.D. on one side and 10,000 scientists on the other. That would give a fair representation of the division of opinion in the scientific community.
This isn't a scientific argument, ... This is a cultural, political and social battle.
The argument for intelligent design basically depends on saying, 'You haven't answered every question with evolution,'... Well, guess what? Science can't answer every question.
Being a Christian, I'm eager to introduce people to Jesus. I just don't think I should do it in the science classroom.
We don't regard any scientific theory as the absolute truth.
The scientific argument advanced for intelligent design at the Dover trial, those arguments collapsed, scientifically and intellectually.
© 2020 Inspirational Stories
© 2020 Inspirational Stories